Trying to understand Judging in Felder vs Vick

dickcheney said:
In a world that has time limits and rounds
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
In a world that is flat
 
dickcheney said:
In a world that has time limits and rounds
Click to expand...
And some generally agreed upon judging criteria in which puncturing someone's lung is not enough to warrant an extra point or two for "effective striking"?
 
First round was Felder easy, lots of leg kicks, and Vick got rocked with a combo
 
After the fact doesn’t count, like when Jones broke his toe before finishing chael.
 
Second round was tough to call , buck had control at start but then in secondd part of 2nd Vick was backing up. Strikes were roughly even. Maybe draw for 2n+ round
 
Yeah it's like those judges completely ignore the x ray results or some shit, I got you OP.
 
Aluminati said:
And some generally agreed upon judging criteria in which puncturing someone's lung is not enough to warrant an extra point or two for "effective striking"?
Click to expand...

So you're saying they should go back the day after and change the score? Please never make a thread again.
 
He only knew when doctors scanned it. It was a mild collapse.
 
I thought felder clearly won the first 2 rds and the 3rd was close but hey the mri’s should overturn that. Right op?
 
Just so we’re clear if Vick only landed one punch that caused that injury and Felder landed 100 per round you’d still think Vick won?
 
Aluminati said:
And some generally agreed upon judging criteria in which puncturing someone's lung is not enough to warrant an extra point or two for "effective striking"?
Click to expand...
Do you want an x-ray machine and MRI cageside to see who suffered more damage?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,397
Messages
55,417,661
Members
174,763
Latest member
ThroughTheDakr

Share this page

Back
Top