Crime Lying MSM/Leftists/BLM at it again (Julius Jones)

HOLA said:

I'm not familiar with it, but if this stuff is true, it certainly sounds troubling:

1. Julius Jones was at home having dinner with his parents and sister at the time of the murder; however, his legal team failed to present his alibi at his original trial. His trial attorneys did not call Mr. Jones or his family members to the stand.

2. Mr. Jones did not match the description of the person who committed the crime, which was provided by a sole eyewitness. The person who killed Mr. Howell was described as having 1-2 inches of hair, but Mr. Jones had a shaved head.

3. A man named Christopher Jordan matched the eyewitness’ hair description, but claimed only to have been the “getaway driver” and not the shooter at trial. He was the State’s star witness against Mr. Jones.

In exchange for testifying that Mr. Jones was the shooter, Mr. Jordan was given a plea deal for his alleged role as the “getaway driver.” He served 15 years in prison and, today, he is free.

4. Three people incarcerated with Mr. Jordan at different times have said in sworn affidavits that Mr. Jordan told each of them that he committed the murder and framed Mr. Jones. None of these three men have met Mr. Jones and they do not know one another. And none of them have been offered a shorter sentence or incentive in exchange for disclosing Mr. Jordan’s confessions.

1. Mr. Howell, a white man, was killed in a predominantly white neighborhood. Immediately, then District Attorney Bob Macy characterized the crime as an act of violence committed by Black men, fueled by drugs. This narrative was perpetuated by media coverage.

2. The officer who arrested Mr. Jones called him the n-word and dared him to run, then implied he would shoot him if he did.

3. Eleven out of the 12 jurors at Mr. Jones’ trial were white, and one juror referred to Mr. Jones by the n-word, and suggested that he be taken out behind the courthouse and shot.

4. One-third of District Attorney Macy’s death penalty convictions have been overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct. Many of those whose convictions were vacated are Black people. To date, 10 people sentenced to death in murder cases in Oklahoma have been exonerated.

https://innocenceproject.org/julius-jones-death-row-oklahoma-what-to-know/

Click to expand...

HOLA said:

I'm not familiar with it, but if this stuff is true, it certainly sounds troubling:

1. Julius Jones was at home having dinner with his parents and sister at the time of the murder; however, his legal team failed to present his alibi at his original trial. His trial attorneys did not call Mr. Jones or his family members to the stand.

2. Mr. Jones did not match the description of the person who committed the crime, which was provided by a sole eyewitness. The person who killed Mr. Howell was described as having 1-2 inches of hair, but Mr. Jones had a shaved head.

3. A man named Christopher Jordan matched the eyewitness’ hair description, but claimed only to have been the “getaway driver” and not the shooter at trial. He was the State’s star witness against Mr. Jones.

In exchange for testifying that Mr. Jones was the shooter, Mr. Jordan was given a plea deal for his alleged role as the “getaway driver.” He served 15 years in prison and, today, he is free.

4. Three people incarcerated with Mr. Jordan at different times have said in sworn affidavits that Mr. Jordan told each of them that he committed the murder and framed Mr. Jones. None of these three men have met Mr. Jones and they do not know one another. And none of them have been offered a shorter sentence or incentive in exchange for disclosing Mr. Jordan’s confessions.

1. Mr. Howell, a white man, was killed in a predominantly white neighborhood. Immediately, then District Attorney Bob Macy characterized the crime as an act of violence committed by Black men, fueled by drugs. This narrative was perpetuated by media coverage.

2. The officer who arrested Mr. Jones called him the n-word and dared him to run, then implied he would shoot him if he did.

3. Eleven out of the 12 jurors at Mr. Jones’ trial were white, and one juror referred to Mr. Jones by the n-word, and suggested that he be taken out behind the courthouse and shot.

4. One-third of District Attorney Macy’s death penalty convictions have been overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct. Many of those whose convictions were vacated are Black people. To date, 10 people sentenced to death in murder cases in Oklahoma have been exonerated.

https://innocenceproject.org/julius-jones-death-row-oklahoma-what-to-know/

Click to expand...

HOLA said:

I'm not familiar with it, but if this stuff is true, it certainly sounds troubling:

1. Julius Jones was at home having dinner with his parents and sister at the time of the murder; however, his legal team failed to present his alibi at his original trial. His trial attorneys did not call Mr. Jones or his family members to the stand.

2. Mr. Jones did not match the description of the person who committed the crime, which was provided by a sole eyewitness. The person who killed Mr. Howell was described as having 1-2 inches of hair, but Mr. Jones had a shaved head.

3. A man named Christopher Jordan matched the eyewitness’ hair description, but claimed only to have been the “getaway driver” and not the shooter at trial. He was the State’s star witness against Mr. Jones.

In exchange for testifying that Mr. Jones was the shooter, Mr. Jordan was given a plea deal for his alleged role as the “getaway driver.” He served 15 years in prison and, today, he is free.

4. Three people incarcerated with Mr. Jordan at different times have said in sworn affidavits that Mr. Jordan told each of them that he committed the murder and framed Mr. Jones. None of these three men have met Mr. Jones and they do not know one another. And none of them have been offered a shorter sentence or incentive in exchange for disclosing Mr. Jordan’s confessions.

1. Mr. Howell, a white man, was killed in a predominantly white neighborhood. Immediately, then District Attorney Bob Macy characterized the crime as an act of violence committed by Black men, fueled by drugs. This narrative was perpetuated by media coverage.

2. The officer who arrested Mr. Jones called him the n-word and dared him to run, then implied he would shoot him if he did.

3. Eleven out of the 12 jurors at Mr. Jones’ trial were white, and one juror referred to Mr. Jones by the n-word, and suggested that he be taken out behind the courthouse and shot.

4. One-third of District Attorney Macy’s death penalty convictions have been overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct. Many of those whose convictions were vacated are Black people. To date, 10 people sentenced to death in murder cases in Oklahoma have been exonerated.

https://innocenceproject.org/julius-jones-death-row-oklahoma-what-to-know/

Click to expand...

Mr. Shickadance said:

Did he ever steal a candy bar though? I have to hear everything he did before I make a judgment in this.
Also maybe he took a really expensive as well

Click to expand...

IamStryker said:

Why does the left shill so hard for criminals?

Click to expand...

Scheme said:

Even if he didn't murder him (which the evidence is pretty overwhelming that he did), he stole people's cars at gunpoint, robbed jewelry stores at gunpoint, etc. For me that's enough to say this guy doesn't deserve to live in society anymore.

I think too many people empathize with scum. Imagine you are just getting a pizza, some dude walks up to you with a gun, points it at your head and steals your car. That shouldn't be allowed to happen in any society, and people that are willing to do that should be removed from it.

Click to expand...

Slick_36 said:

Yeah, I'm not really sure punishing someone for a crime they didn't commit because they did another crime is wise. That's pretty antithetical to what we consider fair and just.

Click to expand...

PrinceOfPain said:

You're misrepresenting what the poster you're quoting actually said.

Click to expand...

IamStryker said:

I take it you did not watch the second video?

Click to expand...

IamStryker said:

Why does the left shill so hard for criminals? I get the systemic racism argument but what about the truth? How would you feel helping a murderer go free? What about the victims family? Do they not deserve justice? Is the below video wrong somewhere? It's hard to find more air tight cases.

Click to expand...

IamStryker said:

I take it you did not watch the second video?

Click to expand...

Scheme said:

Even if he didn't murder him (which the evidence is pretty overwhelming that he did), he stole people's cars at gunpoint, robbed jewelry stores at gunpoint, etc. For me that's enough to say this guy doesn't deserve to live in society anymore.

I think too many people empathize with scum. Imagine you are just getting a pizza, some dude walks up to you with a gun, points it at your head and steals your car. That shouldn't be allowed to happen in any society, and people that are willing to do that should be removed from it.

Click to expand...