Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The time is long overdue to abolish the FDA.
PGA Weblog ^

Posted on 07/14/2018 6:54:40 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica

In the last several days I've had four different people in discussions about what is going on with cigar regulations. For whatever reason, this story has people talking. On the surface, that's great. The devastation that government regulation wreaks upon our society normally goes unnoticed.

But my answer to solve the problem is one that nobody ever considers: Abolish the Food and Drug Administration. And I know what thoughts people have in their minds because I can see the look of surprise on their faces: "But what about our food?" "what about drug safety?" These and other questions just like them only prove just how well progressives have embedded themselves within our culture. We simply do not need government controlling every aspect of our lives.

Yes, I said control, because that's the real reason why the FDA was invented in the first place. The early progressives are just like today's progressives. They didn't care about our food. What they saw was an opportunity. A crisis is a terrible thing to waste. They even admit it. All of this government usurpation of our food arguably got started with the book "The Jungle", by Upton Sinclair. Sinclair famously stated that "I aimed for the public's heart, and hit it in the stomach". Translation: I was malcontenting for ways to make government bigger and help out my union thug friends, and ended up creating a new kind of opportunity in the process. So I really don't need to hear from anybody that the progressives are oh-so-caring and just had our best interests at heart with their creation of the FDA.

And even if you're the kind of person who refuses to look at ideology, acknowledge the motivation that ideology has in people's lives - even if you would rather play hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil about progressivism, the results of the FDA are just as obvious.

To the progressives, attacking industry is all that matters. That's why they use an organization originally put together for FOOD as a weapon against a non food maker. When is the last time you saw someone eating a cigar? Well the FDA doesn't care about that. They just care about their power. The FDA has proven to be untrustworthy.

And it's not like this is some lone isolated case. Cases like this happen routinely in whatever form they manifest themselves. And then there's the arbitrary roadblocks for experimental medicine. But these one-off examples are actually a distraction. If the progressives couldn't use the FDA for their attacks, they would probably use the ATF to get it done. For them, it's a big fat whatever. They know the media will cover for them anyways.

"But can't we just fix the FDA instead of some extreme measure like abolishing it?" What's broken about it, exactly? The FDA is doing exactly what the progressives designed it for in the first place. It's putting controls into society for the purposes of whatever goals the progressives have in any given month or decade. Oh you meant just fixing the FDA so that it only actually focuses in on Food and Drugs and nothing else? But that's not its true purpose. We have over 100 years of progressivism now to prove this. We have their words to prove it, in book after book after book. Progressives have only ever cared about control and the proof is also everywhere you look.

I would argue that the FDA was the progressive movement's first step toward government control of healthcare in the United States. When did we get the FDA? 1906. When did the progressives start calling for government healthcare? 1912. Anybody who understands progressivism knows that's not a coincidence. It only took them six years to "make progress" and move on to their next goal of usurpation. What about the D in FDA? Does that have anything to do with health or healthcare?

The FDA and the long road to government control of healthcare is actually a tale of progressive greed. Enough is never enough with these people. They simply check off a box, and move on to the next thing hoping to gain more control. They don't just say "We want to control your food, but just your food. After that we're done! We swear! Honest! We won't ask to control anything else, never dream of it! We honestly do not have any other ambitions in your private life." The fact is that the progressives just keep on plotting and scheming and intriguing over the next target.

You want to put a significant crater in the move toward socialized medicine? Then your top priority is the abolition of the FDA. Go right for the source, the foundation. Go for the jugular.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bureaucracy; fda; progressingamerica; progressivism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2018 6:54:41 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nicollo; Kalam; IYAS9YAS; laplata; mvonfr; Southside_Chicago_Republican; celmak; SvenMagnussen; ...

Ping............


2 posted on 07/14/2018 6:56:09 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

absurd.


3 posted on 07/14/2018 6:56:58 PM PDT by raiderboy (Trump has assured us that he will shut down the government to get the WALL in Sept.ith the solar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

How about the FED?


4 posted on 07/14/2018 6:58:36 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

The FED should be radically changed — they need to be audited and answer to the Secretary of the Treasury. They are unconstitutional as hell.


5 posted on 07/14/2018 7:01:56 PM PDT by raiderboy (Trump has assured us that he will shut down the government to get the WALL in Sept.ith the solar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Anything goverment can do a free market can do better

Serious caveat emptor might help clean the gene pool a bit too so i am all for it


6 posted on 07/14/2018 7:02:22 PM PDT by Manuel OKelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Reading that sure was a waste of time.


7 posted on 07/14/2018 7:05:18 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
While you're at it, the Agriculture dept, the Energy dept., the EPA, the Education dept, The Legal Services Corporation, the NSA, the Housing and Urban Development Agency, and every other alphabet agency. Remember this, from 1776? "He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance." Is it not about time to end these worthless agencies?
8 posted on 07/14/2018 7:08:03 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Not greed, control over people’s lives.

See my tagline.


9 posted on 07/14/2018 7:12:51 PM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
p01c

Friends mom way back in college days was a chicken inspector and she would tell you stories.

No thanks, abolish the FBI and ATF instead.

10 posted on 07/14/2018 7:16:04 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Actually, I’d rather eat untainted food and know that if I must take a drug, it will be safe and (at least somewhat) effective.


11 posted on 07/14/2018 7:24:46 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
All of this government usurpation of our food arguably got started with the book "The Jungle", by Upton Sinclair
This is true. Sinclair described how slaughterhouses at the time would process disease animals, put chemicals in the meat to mask the taste, and sell it as normal. Plus appalling (and deeply unhealthy) sanitary conditions. This book led to a government fact-finding mission which confirmed the meat-packing allegations were largely true. I'm pretty far over to the libertarian side of things, but I absolutely support government enforcement of truthful labels for food and basic sanitary conditions. So put me in the "reform and loosen" rather than the "abolish" camp.
12 posted on 07/14/2018 7:38:17 PM PDT by TennesseeProfessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeProfessor
This is true. Sinclair described how slaughterhouses at the time would process disease animals, put chemicals in the meat to mask the taste, and sell it as normal. Plus appalling (and deeply unhealthy) sanitary conditions. This book led to a government fact-finding mission which confirmed the meat-packing allegations were largely true. I'm pretty far over to the libertarian side of things, but I absolutely support government enforcement of truthful labels for food and basic sanitary conditions. So put me in the "reform and loosen" rather than the "abolish" camp.

And one of the biggest employers of illegal aliens is the meat packing industry.

Wash your chicken.

13 posted on 07/14/2018 7:43:16 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

My husband worked (and roomed) with some Mexicans, on an out of town job, once. He said they and their habits were filthy and that you couldn’t even use the shower, or the kitchen, after they got done with it. He and the other guys finally kicked them out and told the foreman they refused to room with them.
On the other hand, I have a friend who is Mexican, and she is scrupulously clean.


14 posted on 07/14/2018 7:55:13 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“Actually, I’d rather eat untainted food and know that if I must take a drug, it will be safe and (at least somewhat) effective.”

Wisdom. To say the least.


15 posted on 07/14/2018 7:57:25 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

I don’t want my chicken so amped up on hormones that it does not jump out of the oven and run around my kitchen. The FDA is needed to keep it under control.


16 posted on 07/14/2018 8:13:00 PM PDT by jonrick46 (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

I’m not an anarchist so I have little problem with government providing the basics ie infrastructure and protection from hazardous chemicals and fraud. The FDA is good if it sticks with protecting the general health and safety of the country. That doesn’t include free abortion drugs btw.


17 posted on 07/14/2018 8:16:49 PM PDT by jarwulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

The FDA justifies the years-long process to approve drugs faster than European countries because their bureaucratic foot-dragging in the 1960s allowed the US to escape the thalidomide disaster that befell Europe.


18 posted on 07/14/2018 8:24:47 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The ONLY purpose for gun control is so that one group can force its will on a less powerful group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

The FDA serves an essential purpose and at one time this was very good. The FDA has become too powerful and actually oppressive in its rules and regulations. We need the FDA but its powers need to much limited.


19 posted on 07/14/2018 8:34:19 PM PDT by cpdiii (Cane Cutter, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
The FDA justifies the years-long process to approve drugs faster than European countries because their bureaucratic foot-dragging in the 1960s allowed the US to escape the thalidomide disaster that befell Europe.

That is true. However at the same time they delayed the use of Beta Blockers in the USA by years. Europe had them and used them. Many thousands of lives were lost because of this. Far more lives than the Thalidomide tragedy. The problem with the FDA is they use to much caution. Oddly an exception has been the fast tracking of drugs to tread HIV. In this case the FDA did not err on the side of caution and this was a good decision. However this decision was due to well organized political correctness and pressure.

cpdiii Pharmacist

20 posted on 07/14/2018 8:52:25 PM PDT by cpdiii (Cane Cutter, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson