Skip to main content

USB-C vs. Thunderbolt 3

Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C are hard to distinguish, but here's how the ports differ

Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C are frequently mentioned in the same breath, making understanding the difference between the two quite challenging for the average person.

Both are hardware connection technologies, but they do function in different ways. Here’s everything you need to know about USB-C, Thunderbolt 3, how they overlap, and what their specialties are.

What’s the real difference?

Image used with permission by copyright holder

USB-C is one of the latest USB hardware designs, a very significant upgrade for the USB port that added some important features, including the ability to (at last) connect no matter which side was up and the ability to deliver up to 100 watts of power to charge devices. It can also provide data transfer speeds up to 10Gbps and support video for a 4K display — although the connection does need converters to output audio data properly.

Then we have Thunderbolt. Thunderbolt was a connectivity technology developed via a partnership between Intel and Apple, a combination of PCI Express, DisplayPort, and DC power technologies. This makes Thunderbolt a versatile connection option for the devices that support it, and Thunderbolt 3 is currently the fastest, most powerful version available. As you might expect, Thunderbolt connections are frequently found on Apple products, although other brands worldwide have made use of them as well.

Now comes the complicated part: The two connection technologies were separate for several years, supporting different devices for different people. However, as time passed, this became less feasible, and the two technologies started to resemble each other more.

By the time the USB-C port type showed up, both technologies were similar enough that Thunderbolt was designed to connect using only USB-C ports. So, we saw companies begin to add extra Thunderbolt 3 hardware to USB-C connections so that the USB-C ports could be used as Thunderbolt 3, essentially adding Thunderbolt capabilities to the new USB-C ports.

What capabilities does Thunderbolt 3 add?

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Thunderbolt 3 is a step up from what USB-C alone can offer. It does a lot, but the key features of the connection include:

  • 40Gbps speeds, far faster than what USB-C can offer by itself.
  • Support for up to two 4K displays or a 5K display for routing video and audio out.
  • Native audio support.
  • Special cables are required for longer connections, which do lead to a decrease in data speeds.
  • Serial connection of multiple devices linked together and accessed by one computer.
  • And, of course, compatibility with all devices that require a Thunderbolt 3 connection, as well as all USB devices.

Can a port be USB-C but not Thunderbolt 3?

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Yes, it can. Many USB-C ports don’t have Thunderbolt 3 capabilities and only offer connections through the USB 3.1 (Gen 1/Gen 2) protocol. This is why, for the time being, ports have an awkward naming system that must explicitly state “USB-C Thunderbolt 3” so people know it supports both options. Devices are being made that have the ability to use either USB-C or Thunderbolt 3 connections on these ports based on what they need or support.

However, note that the reverse is not true: A Thunderbolt 3 port, by design, can also function as a USB-C port. There is no separate, special Thunderbolt 3 port, as there was for past versions of the Thunderbolt connection. However, special Thunderbolt 3 cables are used to access the full capabilities of the connection, so keep that in mind when buying. If you’re looking for USB-C cables, we have a list you may want to check out.

You can tell if your USB-C supports the Thunderbolt 3 standard by looking for the small Thunderbolt logo. Whether it’s a laptop port or on a cable itself, a Thunderbolt port is usually accompanied by the logo. There are some exceptions, though, so always check the specifications of the particular product in question.

So, Thunderbolt 3 is better than just USB-C?

google-pixel-3a-usb-c
Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

USB-C is far from a bad port: It’s much faster than past generations and very versatile, with the welcome ability to charge up accessory devices. So don’t feel like you have to get a Thunderbolt 3 port if you don’t actually need one. But yes, in a head-to-head comparison, Thunderbolt 3 is better than USB-C in basically every way.

With USB4 on the way, it’s catching up rapidly. But as it stands, yes, Thunderbolt 3 is a faster and more capable standard. So, why don’t companies turn all USB-C ports into Thunderbolt 3?

Remember, USB and Thunderbolt spent many years as siloed, competitive technologies. Ultimately, the two technologies are trying to join forces, but there are many obstacles, namely universal pairing capabilities and a unique name for the final combined port.

Devices that contain the specific parts to support Thunderbolt 3 connections will undoubtedly be more expensive. Some companies might not want to include this extra expense quite yet, especially not more budget-oriented devices. Other companies may prefer to save money by making only one port on their devices, Thunderbolt 3 while keeping the other ports USB-C. This also makes the device easier to design and power.

If your apparatus isn’t an Intel-powered device, then you won’t be able to use Thunderbolt 3 technology. Considering there are plenty of devices out there that don’t fit the bill, this is an issue that manufacturers will have to prioritize.

Editors' Recommendations

Tyler Lacoma
Former Digital Trends Contributor
If it can be streamed, voice-activated, made better with an app, or beaten by mashing buttons, Tyler's into it. When he's not…
GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5: how much difference is there?
The ChatGPT website on an iPhone.

Have you heard of GPT-4? It's the latest language model for OpenAI's natural language chatbot, and it's said to be much better than GPT 3.5, which is available on ChatGPT. But how much better is it and what makes it different?

That's what we're here to find out, with a direct head-to-head comparison of these two exciting, but distinctly different language models. Ultimately, we can decide whether it's worth paying the extra for a ChatGPT Plus subscription, or if it's better to just use GPT-4 for free.
What are GPT 3.5 and GPT-4?

Read more
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs. Intel Core i9-13900K: only one choice for PC gamers
AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D inside of its packaging.

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Intel Core i9-13900K are undoubtedly two of the best processors you can buy, but they aren't equal. We threw both of the CPUs on the test bench to answer the age-old question: is AMD or Intel better?

Based on our testing, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D wins this bout, mostly on the back of the excellent gaming performance AMD's 3D V-Cache technology brings. Intel's Core i9-13900K still holds up, particularly in productivity apps, but Team Red takes the win this time around.
Pricing and availability

Read more
Samsung Galaxy Book 3 Ultra vs. MacBook Pro 16-inch
Someone typing on the Samsung Galaxy Book 3 Ultra.

Apple's MacBook Pro 16 has emerged as one of the best laptops you can buy in the 16-inch class. It's incredibly well-built, elegantly designed, superfast and efficient, and has the best keyboard and touchpad on a laptop today. It's a hard machine to compete with outside of its high price.

But that didn't stop Samsung from pushing out the Galaxy Book 3 Ultra, which is stocked with fast Intel and Nvidia components and aimed at providing a competitive but lighter 16-inch machine. The Galaxy Book3 Ultra looks good on paper, but can it compete with the MacBook Pro 16?
Specs

Read more