Ok, so it's not specifically high speed internet (I mean it is, but that's not the argument):
* Charter charges more money for more bandwidth (duh)
* Charter is slow to respond to copyright allegations (with the standard lack of evidence or proof)
Therefore charter's business model is based on encouraging piracy. Obviously no customers are wanting a high bandwidth connection to compensate for the ludicrous amounts of bandwidth used by the advertising on media companies' streaming services.
Who even still pirates music? And why would high speeds enable piracy of tiny audio files that were easy to pirate even on an 800 kbps kbps connection.
