YouTube wants us to #EvolveTheDefinition of "Masculine"

Horse Style

Horse Style

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
18,557
Reaction score
19,281
I found this on the homepage of YouTube:



Apparently, the men in this video aren't okay with the current definition of "masculine". They want to expand the definition to include effeminate, limp-wristed soyboys perfectly fine gentlemen like themselves.

I'm just curious what the 6'5", 275-pound-benching, 5%-bodyfat-having Sherdoggers' reactions are to this silly ass progressive, enlightened message.
 
All of those guys look like dweebs
 
Bunch of pussies imo.
 
So brave that they courageously dodged getting demonetized by youtube if they don't play along.
 
So basically they just want us to broaden the definition so they'll be considered manly?


<36>
 
Youtube didn't make this video.
 
Definitions aren’t really supposed to evolve. That’s kinda the whole point... they are already defined.

I’m all for treating people of all different walks of life with respect, and I have love in my heart for the weirdos, especially being one myself to a degree, and I hold freedom as a fundamental principle, and I’m open-minded about how other people want to live their lives, so long as they are not hurting others, etc...

... but I’m also not interested in brain-washing, or indoctrination, or compelled speech. Or having random people, youtube-approved or not, ‘evolve’ the definitions of words for me.



giphy.gif
 
Nah, I already know what masculine means. I'm good.

If you want to find a new word to describe dying your hair like a rainbow and wearing eyeshadow while you watch some other dude screw your wife, go ahead and make up a word for it.
 
"Those definitions are a little scary." Yup, "masculine" doesn't apply to you.
 
Jesus those guys are pathetic...definition of slack-jawed fa*g*ts...
 
Horse Style said:
I found this on the homepage of YouTube:



Apparently, the men in this video aren't okay with the current definition of "masculine". They want to expand the definition to include effeminate, limp-wristed soyboys perfectly fine gentlemen like themselves.

I'm just curious what the 6'5", 275-pound-benching, 5%-bodyfat-having Sherdoggers' reactions are to this silly ass progressive, enlightened message.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif
 
Peteyandjia said:
Definitions aren’t really supposed to evolve. That’s kinda the whole point... they are already defined.

I’m all for treating people of all different walks of life with respect, and I have love in my heart for the weirdos, especially being one myself to a degree, and I hold freedom as a fundamental principle, and I’m open-minded about how other people want to live their lives, so long as they are not hurting others, etc...

... but I’m also not interested in brain-washing, or indoctrination, or compelled speech. Or having random people, youtube-approved or not, ‘evolve’ the definitions of words for me.



giphy.gif
Click to expand...

Yep. This exactly.
 
It takes a strong man to not cry while you're watching your wife get smashed by a 6'6 shredded Mandingo warrior. Or is it that by crying you're rejecting gender norms and therefore being a strong man? Jesus I'm failing liberalism this semester
 
Horse Style said:
I found this on the homepage of YouTube:



Apparently, the men in this video aren't okay with the current definition of "masculine". They want to expand the definition to include effeminate, limp-wristed soyboys perfectly fine gentlemen like themselves.

I'm just curious what the 6'5", 275-pound-benching, 5%-bodyfat-having Sherdoggers' reactions are to this silly ass progressive, enlightened message.
Click to expand...


<23>

How about.....
<3>

I am 100% on board with people living how they want to live, but I am not gonna redefine my value system so someone else can feel like something they are not.

I’ve seen masculine mamas boys. I’ve seen masculine gay men. I’ve seen masculine FtM trannies. Hell I’ve seen masculine lesbians. I’ve seen masculine men that are tender and sensitive. There is absolutely no reason to redefine what masculine means.

Identity politics is a cancer on society right now.
 
Horse Style said:
I found this on the homepage of YouTube:



Apparently, the men in this video aren't okay with the current definition of "masculine". They want to expand the definition to include effeminate, limp-wristed soyboys perfectly fine gentlemen like themselves.

I'm just curious what the 6'5", 275-pound-benching, 5%-bodyfat-having Sherdoggers' reactions are to this silly ass progressive, enlightened message.
Click to expand...


As soon as I read this thread title, I knew what the topic would be.

Mainstream media has begun this very disturbing issue of attempting to uproot masculinity and replace it with pussies.

Please don't read into this as an implication that I support insecure, roid raging, Budweiser guzzling, littering, low class woman beating, affliction shirt wearing douchebags. On the flip side, however, I don't support this subversive effort to mind fuck us into thinking that the tight jeans, stupid beard, effemanite submissive cowardly egotism of today's yuppies are all kosher and respectable. Call it like it is. One is a trashy douche bag, the other is a bitch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,579
Messages
55,428,205
Members
174,774
Latest member
Judoka_Noob

Share this page

Back
Top