Elections Rudy Allegedly Asked Trump for Pardon

O

Overtures

Guest
The Times:


Rudolph W. Giuliani, President Trump’s lawyer who has led the most extensive efforts to damage his client’s political rivals and undermine the election results, discussed with the president as recently as last week the possibility of receiving a pre-emptive pardon before Mr. Trump leaves office, according to two people told of the discussion.

It was not clear who raised the topic. The men have also talked previously about a pardon for Mr. Giuliani, according to the people. Mr. Trump has not indicated what he will do, one of the people said.

Mr. Giuliani’s potential criminal exposure is unclear. He was under investigation as recently as last summer by federal prosecutors in Manhattan for his business dealings in Ukraine and his role in ousting the American ambassador there, a plot that was at the heart of the impeachment of Mr. Trump.

Mr. Giuliani did not respond to a message seeking comment. Christianne Allen, his spokeswoman, said, “Mayor Giuliani cannot comment on any discussions that he has with his client.”

Mr. Giuliani’s lawyer, Robert Costello, said, “He’s not concerned about this investigation, because he didn’t do anything wrong and that’s been our position from Day 1.”

A spokeswoman for Mr. Trump did not respond to an email seeking comment.

Such a broad pardon pre-empting any charge or conviction is highly unusual but does have precedent. George Washington pardoned plotters of the Whiskey Rebellion, shielding them from treason prosecutions. In the most famous example, Gerald R. Ford pardoned Richard M. Nixon for all of his actions as president. Jimmy Carter pardoned thousands of American men who illegally avoided the draft for the Vietnam War.”
 
"undermine the election results" lol.......its amazing that people can sleep thru blatant MSM bias...
 
What would you call it?
160912.jpg
 
"undermine the election results" lol.......its amazing that people can sleep thru blatant MSM bias...

legit that’s what he is doing. It’s not even up for debate. They want to throw out millions of legal ballots and literally break the law to stop states from certifying.


How do you figure they should word that?
 
I'm sure this is probably true just like all the other speculative threads that you're throwing up with baseless sources
 
Hannity said its clear Bunker Boy needs to pardon himself, but Bunker Boy will step down and let Pence pardon him.

Then New York will get his ass

 
No federal agency is going to lay charges on Trump or Rudy before January 20th anyways.
 
You're about 0 and 92i474883828289r594902 now. Throw this one on the pile?


You’re assuming I’m making predictions based on these allegations rather than using them as missing puzzle pieces that fill in an otherwise reliable and complete portrait of Rudy’s disgrace.

Point is, who cares? At this point, your “but but but anon sources” argument is just a nuisance. We’ve got Rudy holding fake hearings wherein he pushes not only anon sources but blatant lies. Where were you, great soldier of source integrity, then?


You don’t care.
 
You’re assuming I’m making predictions based on these allegations rather than using them as missing puzzle pieces that fill in an otherwise reliable and complete portrait of Rudy’s disgrace.

Point is, who cares? At this point, your “but but but anon sources” argument is just a nuisance. We’ve got Rudy holding fake hearings wherein he pushes not only anon sources but blatant lies. Where were you, great soldier of source integrity, then?


You don’t care.
my point is that you're completely idiotic and keep doing the exact same thing over and over again and then your thread just dies and you stop talking about it a week later when you find out the anonymous source was actually your left nut
 
my point is that you're completely idiotic and keep doing the exact same thing over and over again and then your thread just dies and you stop talking about it a week later when you find out the anonymous source was actually your left nut


That’s a gay point.
 
legit that’s what he is doing. It’s not even up for debate. They want to throw out millions of legal ballots and literally break the law to stop states from certifying.


How do you figure they should word that?

Break the law by going to court?
<Huh2>
 
Back
Top