- Joined
- Mar 15, 2015
- Messages
- 3,634
- Reaction score
- 3,916
Who in your opinion has the biggest difference between offense and defense in striking?
My vote is for Stipe. The dude has KOd or severely damaged almost anyone hes ever fought. At the same time he has some of the worst defense ive ever seen. His head movement is almost non existant and he just plods forward eating punches so he can return fire.
Offense rating: 10/10
Defense rating 2/10
Honerable mention to Khabib whos offense on the feet is terrible (besides the one time he rocked Conor) hut has pretty decent defense. Dustin Porier even said he was so awkward he could never get a rhythm.
Offense rating: 2/10
Defense rating: 7/10
My vote is for Stipe. The dude has KOd or severely damaged almost anyone hes ever fought. At the same time he has some of the worst defense ive ever seen. His head movement is almost non existant and he just plods forward eating punches so he can return fire.
Offense rating: 10/10
Defense rating 2/10
Honerable mention to Khabib whos offense on the feet is terrible (besides the one time he rocked Conor) hut has pretty decent defense. Dustin Porier even said he was so awkward he could never get a rhythm.
Offense rating: 2/10
Defense rating: 7/10