Durham University academic who said Sadiq Khan wanted to make London 'a Mecca for Muslims' and blasted Jewish media moguls in string of antisemitic and Islamophobic tweets is stripped of honorary fellowship

  • Dr Stephen Pax Leonard stripped of fellowship by Durham University last week
  • Came amid complaints about tweets said to be antisemitic and Islamophobic
  • In now deleted posts he said Sadiq Khan wants London to be 'Mecca for Muslims'
  • Also made series of comments about Jewish families owning the Swedish media 

An academic at the prestigious Durham University has been stripped of his title for sending what were said to be anti-Semitic and Islamophobic tweets. 

Dr Stephen Pax Leonard, an honorary research fellow with St Chad's college since October 2017, was stripped of his position after posting offensive comments online.

The academic claimed London mayor Sadiq Khan wants London to become a 'Mecca for Muslims' and made comments about Jewish families owning the Swedish media. 

In a now deleted tweet, Dr Leonard wrote: 'He [Sadiq Khan] is a miserable little excuse for mayor. He just wants London to be a mecca for Muslims.'

In another post, also deleted, he wrote: 'With so few Jews, it is extraordinary that the [Swedish] print media is largely owned and edited by Jewish families.'

He also allegedly claimed 'tens of millions of Muslims support ISIS.' 

The university became aware of these comments in October and condemned them as 'objectionable and ill-judged' and revoked Dr Leonard's honorary title last week.

In a now deleted tweet, grabbed by student journalists, Dr Leonard wrote: 'He [Sadiq Khan] is a miserable little excuse for mayor. He just wants London to be a mecca for Muslims'

A Durham University spokesman said: 'The views that have been reported are wholly inconsistent with the values of Durham University and of St Chad's College.

'While St Chad's College is fully committed to free speech, the Principal has concluded that Dr Leonard's comments, as reported, were objectionable and ill-judged and fell far short of the standards of discourse expected of a Senior Research Fellow.

'The Principal has therefore withdrawn Dr Leonard's research fellowship, which is an honorary, unpaid position.'

Third year archaeology and ancient history student Chris Clarke, who is president of the Durham Union, said that Dr Leonard's remarks were 'dangerous'.

Third year archaeology and ancient history student Chris Clarke, who is president of the Durham Union, said that Dr Leonard's remarks were 'dangerous'

He said: 'The comments that were made I personally believe are quite dangerous. It's effectively inciting individuals to engage with Islamophobic rhetoric. It reflects a really dangerous set of ideas.'

Mr Clarke said that while the Durham Union debating society promotes free speech, it draws the line at the promotion of hate speech.

A Durham University spokesman said: 'The views that have been reported are wholly inconsistent with the values of Durham University and of St Chad's College'

A Durham University spokesman said: 'The views that have been reported are wholly inconsistent with the values of Durham University and of St Chad's College'

He added that most people at the university are aware of Dr Leonard's comments and that the general view is that they were unacceptable.

However, postgraduate student Angelos Sofocleous, who made headlines earlier this after he was sacked by two student publications as a student editor for re-posting a tweet which said 'women don't have a penis', believes that Dr Leonard has become the latest victim of the Durham 'thought police'.

He said: 'I do find his views inappropriate and I do not agree with them. But I find the reaction from the university equally innapropriate. The comments were made in a public forum from his personal account.

'It's the same response the thought police and free speech police used for me.'

Mr Sofocleous believes no action should have been taken against Dr Leonard and said that the academic has a right to express his views.

Dr Leonard told MailOnline:

'These are not 'tweets', but 'replies'. 'Replies' are responses to somebody else's tweet, and thus their true meaning can only be understood in the context of the 'tweet'. They have little meaning out of context. Some of these 'replies' such as the one about Sadiq Khan were, I believe, doctored to make a case against me when my social media was compromised. The College was made aware of this. I have absolutely no recognition of this tweet. I stand by the other factual statements I made in the ‘replies’, and apologise for any offence inadvertently caused. I hold absolutely no anti-semitic or Islamophobic opinions whatsoever.'

'I am aware of recent accusations made against me by student journalists claiming that I hold Far-Right, anti-semitic and Islamophobic views. I wish to rebut these libellous accusations which are absurd, totally unfounded and deeply upsetting. None of these commentators have read any of my published works. Instead, they are basing their allegations on ‘replies’ to tweets taken completely out of context and manipulated to make a case against me.'

'My latest book ‘Ideology of Failure’ makes the case for the freedom of speech and alerts people to the dangers of group-think, political correctness and zero-sum identity politics. On page 2 of the book I explain clearly why I reject the alt-right identitarian movement and abhor identity politics of any kind. In this book and in my previous collection of essays, I make it very clear that I support a green conservatism à la Zac Goldsmith that repeals hate-speech legislation and preserves the freedom of speech at all costs.' 

 

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.