trophy slideshow-left slideshow-right chevron-left chevron-right chevron-light chevron-light play play-outline external-arrow pointer hodinkee-shop hodinkee-shop share-arrow share show-more-arrow watch101-hotspot instagram nav dropdown-arrow full-article-view read-more-arrow close close close email facebook h image-centric-view newletter-icon pinterest search-light hodinkee-logo search magnifying-glass thumbnail-view twitter view-image checkmark triangle-down chevron-right-circle chevron-right-circle-white lock shop live events conversation watch plus plus-circle camera comments download x heart comment default-watch-avatar overflow check-circle right-white right-black comment-bubble instagram speech-bubble shopping-bag shop watch Stories Sort Arrows New Search Clear Search

Hands-On The Chopard Quattro Mark IV — The Most Impressive Release Of Watches And Wonders 2025

Happy Diamonds and "jewelry brand" no longer, Chopard updates its nine-day power reserve dress option in spectacular fashion.

Lost in the Land-Dweller, Cubitus, and tariff headline-stealing madness of Watches and Wonders 2025, a nearly undeniably great watch snuck right under our typically hyper-sensitive watch enthusiast noses.

The Chopard Quattro Mark IV is a 39mm in diameter, precious metal dress watch powered by the four-stacked barrel caliber L.U.C 98.09-L, resulting in nine days of power reserve. That's objective. Subjectively, the 2025 Quattro is the best new time-only or time-and-date watch I've handled this year. That's right, better than Patek's latest Calatrava, lauded by my boss Ben as "the best Calatrava in a generation," better than whatever competitor is popping into your head right now. I am probably not allowed to call Chopard's Quattro a Calatrava, but I can say that it does what a Calatrava should do better than most Calatravas offered by the Calatrava brand this century. Let me tell you why.

Chopard Quattro Mark IV

Nuance and complexity are no longer a part of our culture. Buzzy, hype releases are easy to have an opinion on without nuance or complexity. New watches from brands that your uncle might recognize at Easter brunch might get more views and comments here on Hodinkee. But a four-barrel, nine-day power reserve, in-house caliber inside of a bassine-shaped precious metal case offered by what many may still consider a "jewelry brand" takes a bit more work to dig into. The Quattro requires complex understanding and nuanced thinking. And that's what makes it great.

Chopard was founded in 1860 as a watchmaker, then became famous as a jeweler, and since 1996 has been making serious waves again as a watchmaker. While I just made the same mistake, the regular criticism of Chopard being a jewelry house isn't totally fair. The brand's first jewelry collection was introduced in 1985, after 125 years of watches. And it was only 11 years later that Chopard debuted its first L.U.C movement, the caliber 1.96, a Michel Parmigiani design lauded as "perhaps the finest automatic movement being made in Switzerland today" by Walt Odets on Timezone in 2002.

Chopard Caliber 1.96

Original Chopard Caliber 1.96

The brand's successes in jewelry are used against it in the minds of watch buyers. I hope this is mostly subconscious, but the harsh reality is that fewer people aspire to merely look after a Chopard for the next generation, and that's a shame.

Vats of internet ink have been spent on that first L.U.C caliber, the 1.96 (including here on Hodinkee), and rightfully so, but Chopard's sophomore release was no Speed 2: Cruise Control. Introduced in 2000, the Quattro was the result of Chopard's watchmaking team looking at their first movement and asking, "Ok, but how can we make the power reserve longer, like, way longer?" Supposedly, Daniel Bolognesi, now Head of Watchmaking, jokingly suggested removing the 1.96's microtor to make room for more barrels, and that's exactly what the team ended up doing. The result was the caliber 1.98 with four stacked barrels, two of which were roughly located in the microtor's previous location, and the L.U.C Quattro ref. 16/1863 or "Mark I" — a 38mm in diameter limited edition of 1860 pieces across yellow gold, rose gold, white gold, and platinum. As with the first run of 1860 caliber 1.96 limited editions, it doesn't seem Chopard produced the full number, making both very rare and collectible.

Chopard Quattro Mark I, Mark II, Mark III, Mark IV

Top: Mark I, Mark II

Bottom: Mark III, Mark IV

The first update to the Quattro came in 2015, with the "Mark II," and while the 43mm case diameter and proud Roman numerals were probably on trend then, we can move on quickly. And we can also continue to move quickly past the "Mark III" of 2018. The quality of the movement is, of course, the same for these two middle generations, but the aesthetics and sizing are just not for me. A bonus shout-out to the Quattro Table Clock of 2012 because, why not?

New for Watches and Wonders 2025, the latest Quattro, now officially titled the Mark IV, is undoubtedly a return to form for the model. It's a release that loosely follows the playbook of the L.U.C 1860 of 2023, although it strays further away from the territory of "reissues." Rather than recreating that first and now extremely collectible Quattro, Chopard has thoroughly rethought the case and dial, as a part of a new aesthetic direction for the L.U.C collection. When the initial press release hit my inbox, it included only the rose gold variant (informing a quick Introducing article), but when I visited the Chopard booth, I was greeted with this gorgeous platinum option — a perfect surprise.

Chopard Quattro Mark IV
Chopard Quattro Mark IV
Chopard Quattro Mark IV

This new direction, first messaged around January's Flying T Twin Perpetual and Lunar One releases, is music to my ears. If there is a criticism to be levied towards Chopard's L.U.C history, it is that middle bit, between the last few years and the turn of the 21st century — a time when the brand was finding its personal style, let's call it. Look no further than the Mark II and III Quattros for proof; classic and timeless aren't the first words that come to mind. However, the changes that Chopard plans to slowly integrate across the L.U.C collection include a smarter "bassine" case shape with more pronounced lugs and, editorializing here, an overall simple, refined dial design ethos.

After experiencing the new L.U.C case shape in the Chopard booth, via both the Lunar One and the Quattro, I am pleased to report that it does what it says on the tin. Many brands like to talk about a sleeker case redesign that "allows for ease and comfort of wear for the modern enthusiast," but few actually follow through with that verbose promise. Here, Chopard backs it up. I'm a watch lover who prefers a case diameter south of 38mm, yet I couldn't take the Quattro off my wrist. No, I mean it, I wore it for my entire hour-long meeting. I'll credit the "bassine" midcase — where the base measures a few millimeters smaller than the full 39mm of the domed bezel — for my immediate pleasure in wearing this watch, one I feared I would find too big.

Chopard Quattro Mark IV movement

The original Quattro's case shape is essentially the same as the first cal. 1.96 watches and was already revived with the Lucent Steel 1860. I'm glad Chopard resisted the temptation to fit the new Quattro into this mold. It's a great case, don't get me wrong, but it feels very neo-vintage — because, well, it is. The de-integrated and now welded lugs are visually congruous top down yet distinct from the side in a slightly less dramatic fashion than, say, a Patek ref. 2523.

Chopard Quattro Mark IV bee "hallmark"

Overall, I found the new case to be very well thought out. It gave me the impression that production costs and efficiencies were not considered in the development process. When you're spending almost $50,000 on a simple watch, that's a feeling you're looking for. One small detail that Chopard has begun to add to all of its platinum watches is the small bee "hallmark" hand-engraved between the bottom lugs — potentially a reference to the various precious metal animal hallmarks of old in Switzerland and France.

While the L.U.C collection is known for its guilloché dial work, you're bound to explore other techniques when you own one of the best dial manufacturers in the world, Metalem. The Quattro features a frosted texture previously seen in the limited edition Full Strike Titanium, although not by many. The finish is a welcome curveball in my eyes, presenting softly and subtly in person. Especially with a dial of this size, guilloché can start to be a bit much, so while a Quattro variant with a guilloché center portion would be welcomed, the choice for frosted does make sense and goes along with the "modernized" L.U.C direction.

Chopard Quattro Mark IV

I keep returning to this word, but the hands and hour markers, too, have been simplified in a great way. The "herringbone-type" markers are rightly sized, and the "dauphine fusée" main handset has been slightly redesigned and downsized compared to last year's XPS Forest Green and even our XPS 1860 Officer Limited Edition For Hodinkee — both going a long way towards that simplified feeling on the wrist.

Flipping the Quattro over, we're greeted by not only an ingenious design, with four jeweled barrels stacked in pairs, Phillips terminal curve balance spring, and Swan's neck adjustable stud carrier, but a level of finishing that is nearly unmatched elsewhere in the industry. If matched, it is via brands with greater cachet and, frankly, at a higher price point. Carrying the Poinçon de Genève, or Geneva Seal, it's hard to beat this in terms of finishing. Furthermore, the Quattro is chronometer-certified by COSC, which is expected for an L.U.C, but it is a real achievement for a watch with a nine-day power reserve — the cal. L.U.C 98.09-L combats the potential accuracy issues that come with a total mainspring length of 1.885 meters by operating the barrels in series, one switching in progressively as the last runs out of juice.

Chopard Quattro Mark IV movement

As for the price? It's $38,400 in ethical 18k rose gold and $47,900 in platinum. Let me be the first to inform you that the Chopard Quattro Mark IV is an expensive watch. It's clear who Chopard sees as a competitor to the L.U.C collection via this pricing. For example, a Lange 1 will set you back $44,700 in rose gold. On day one of Watches and Wonders 2025, the Quattro was joined by two simple platinum watches: the $47,135 Patek ref. 6196P-001 and the $49,900 Zenith G.F.J. — neither offering a date complication nor nine days of running time on a single wind.

Be it my personal preference for an underdog or a deep love and bias for when Chopard nails a L.U.C release, I meant what I said when I chose this as my pick of the Watches and Wonders 2025 litter. But there's something slightly more than "this is Rich Fordon's favorite" going on with the Quattro.

Through the in-house-ization of the watch world over the past decade, some brands have simply created lesser products in favor of making more components in-house. Chopard has vertically integrated in the right way, focusing its manufacturing efforts towards the higher-end of the watchmaking (and price) spectrum. That now decades-long business direction allows for the Quattro. This watch is nuanced, complex, and certainly influenced by the ever-growing "independent" watch mania fueled by names like Philippe Dufour, FP Journe, Rexhep Rexhepi, and Simon Brette. To see a larger brand offer a watch where I am comfortable naming those names in a Hands-On article is commendable. And, by the way, all that nuance aside, the Quattro is such a pleasure to wear, I can't shake it.

For more information, visit Chopard online.

Please log in or sign up to leave a comment.
Pending Approval

Wondering what grit sandpaper that dial is made from :)

Pending Approval

Scorcher of a watch. Great article too.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Great article. Gorgeous watch.

1 Like
Pending Approval

The watch is beautiful. But at this price there are so many other options.

Pending Approval

This is a special reference. I also saw it in Geneva and ordered the rose gold. I just found it more warm and charming, despite my initial intent to go with the platinum.

Pending Approval

Pure class.

1 Like
Pending Approval

A wonderfully-written article about a wonderful watch. Rich, I humbly submit that you should feel very proud of this one! Despite the high price, I would still argue this LUC offers a lot of value for money. To be clear, I'm not talking about resale value, which I maintain is the least interesting aspect of this hobby and distracts from the actual merits of the design, finishing, and engineering that goes into the craft of watchmaking. Instead, I believe this watch offers much more than many of its competitors for the price. When you compare it to the latest Calatrava, as Rich does here, I'd argue you get significantly better case and dial finishing, as well as comparable movement finishing, not to mention the fact that the Patek isn't even COSC with an unimpressively vague PR of (in Patek's own words) "at least 65 hours." Sure, Patek has the hype and name recognition, but I think it's possible that all of Thierry Stern's resting on laurels will come back to haunt the brand down the line. If I had $50k to spend on a dress watch, it'd be this, the new Breguet Classique Souscription 2025, or a Lange I.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Thank you for the great review Rich. I would just like to draw your attention to the fact that, if I'm not mistaken, Mark II was the 2007 Art Deco design version of the Quattro, which is absent from your article. What you call Mark II actually belongs to Mark III launched in 2015 with the Arabic numerals variant coming in 2018. Best regards, Emmanuel

Pending Approval

this would be killer in 36mm

Pending Approval

This is an impressive write up, Rich. Well done! Full of passion mixed with objectivity. Whatever is written in the comments here, I sense that you will be unaffected. You love this watch absolutely.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

I love it too. Great write up.

3 Likes
Pending Approval

Great write up Rich. Watch folks need dudes like you to hype up the not hype stuff.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Who wants to flip their watch over to find out it has 9 days of power reserve? They should print it right on the dial!

Pending Approval

I can't tell if that's sarcasm? If you bought the watch I think you know what the specs are. Personally, i greatly prefer the power reserve indicator on the back of the movement for manual wind watches. You pick it up in the morning at can look at it and decide if it needs a winding. The dial is a masterclass in minimalism and functionality. The stacked date and running seconds subdials are a supremely clever use of dial space and design.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

Firstly, I'm glad you mentioned the power reserve indicator on the back, because even that leaves too much guess work. The meter should be divided into 10 segments so that I can know how many days of power reserve remain when I pick up the watch. And secondly, yes it is sarcasm.

3 Likes
Pending Approval

First glance, it looks like a Seiko cocktail time.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Lol, no.

4 Likes
Pending Approval

As the proud owner of a Cocktail Time, I respectfully disagree. The vibe is very different imho and, while I love my Cocktail Time, I wouldn't call it elegant as it really struggles with case thickness.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Not sure which I like more, the watch or the article. And I do like the watch.

5 Likes
Pending Approval

Agreed, this is one of the best-written watch articles I've read in a while!

1 Like
Pending Approval

"The harsh reality is that fewer people aspire to merely look after a Chopard for the next generation" is a fire line. Superb writeup!

5 Likes
Pending Approval

This.

Pending Approval

i just can’t see what’s so special about this watch. it’s not a bad watch by any means, but surely not worthy of the giddy praise thrown its way. it just looks very generic, like most chopards, no personality to make it memorable. i thought the pf toric from last year was underwhelming, but the chopard comes in even blander.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

There is no requirement you see what other people do.

3 Likes
Pending Approval

that’s a relief. but my point was that other people are not seeing anything either, just hearing praise from the reviewers. this is a very ordinary product for the price, the caliber has been around for a long time, the new case looks worse than the old one, and the dial looks kinda cheap to be honest.

1 Like
Pending Approval

And that's fine. I'm sure, all else being equal, Chopard would like their watches to be admired (and bought) by more people. But given the price they're at and their self-chosen positioning to be a bit niche and "restrained" in style, the fact that the majority of people don't care for their watches probably isn't causing the execs at Chopard to lose any sleep. LUC is above my snack bracket but I love what they're doing. Long may it continue.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

this seems to be a recurring theme with chopard in the online enthusiast space, they are mostly praised by those who’re not planning to buy their watches. those buying are going for patek, lange, vacheron etc.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Yes, probably. If everyone who gives them praise opened their wallets, they wouldn't be at no. 19 in the Morgan Stanley watch report rankings. And yes those numbers are estimates, but (1) that's still pretty impressive and (2) not everyone can be in the top 5 and what's wrong with not being there? Lange isn't there either and I admire them a lot too. Chopard's successful enough as-is so while they are far from being the top dog, again I don't think the execs there are losing sleep about not being Patek.

3 Likes
Pending Approval

here’s how i see it: their micro-rotor and this four-barrel have been around a long time. but just in the last two years, we’ve seen the reviewers go all out praising these products like never before. this sudden jump in appreciation cannot be attributed to the minor updates in case and dials to these long-existing products. so what do we attribute it to? it could be the new crop of reviewers adopting the spectator urge to root for the underdog at the cost of objectively examining design and quality. or, a coordinated marketing push. nothing wrong with either btw.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

Agreed with you fully. I would like to think it's the whole "underdog" thing more than a marketing push but we'll never know. For me I just like LUC because they are more IYKYK than most establishment brands, kinda like an upmarket JLC. But yes you're correct the movement is old news, they really should get to upgrading them sooner rather than later.

Pending Approval

I can’t speak to why journalists are increasing their interest (perhaps it’s because some of the big dogs, not including Rolex, are resting in their laurels a bit?), but I do see merit in this watch when juxtaposed against the competition. Sure, the Patek name carries more cache and resale value, but I would argue that if you removed the brands from this LUC and the new Calatrava, it would be challenging to convince someone that the Calatrava is better. What’s even more striking is that this “old” LUC movement is arguably just as well finished (impossible for me to confirm from photos alone), and is definitely more impressive from an engineering POV. It’s a nine day chronometer which, as other commenters and Rich point out, is no small feat. The Patek? No accuracy specs I could find and a stated PR of, in PP’s words, “at least 65 hours.” FWIW they’re both stunning watches, but I’m siding with Rich here, especially given I’m not too preoccupied with how watches trade on the secondary market.

1 Like
Pending Approval

fwiw? worth nothing unless you buy the watch. but i’m sure chopard are very grateful for another ringing endorsement from a spectator. also, i have to point out the pp seal guarantees -1 to +2 seconds a day. that’s tighter than rolex even. you didn’t find the specs because you didn’t look for it. you want to stick it to patek? then spend money on products from their direct competition. that’s what i do, and i hope and pray others do the same. words will make no difference. but if we all come together and divert enough capital away from them and towards the competition, then we can bring them down. can i count on your support?

Pending Approval

Yikes, seems like a struck a nerve! Fair point on the PP seal, though I do still think there’s merit in the independent verification of COSC. I’m not looking to “stick it to Patek,” they make pretty cool watches and I was using the Calatrava to illustrate why I think the LUC represents value (though I do think Thierry is a bit of an elitist pylon haha). As for how I’d vote with my wallet, I do indeed plan to buy from their direct competition, as I’m eyeing a Saxonia or the new 1815, as I love how much effort Lange puts into their “entry level” pieces. As an aside, I’ve never been a fan of the argument that you have to actually buy these kinds of watches to have an opinion on them. I think the hobby is most fun at its most inclusive, and the exact point where things go from connoisseurship to snobbery can be found when people gatekeep by suggesting a certain amount of income is required to share an opinion. Money doesn’t account for taste, as they say. Watches are, after all, a silly hobby about jewelry at the end of the day and if we’re not having fun what’s the point hahah

1 Like
Pending Approval

wonderful to hear you’re considering a lange, but considering is not enough, you have to buy. let’s talk after you buy, i would be very curious to hear your feedback on the product then.

Pending Approval

Oh I’ve worn Langes for extended periods! I absolutely adore the Saxonia, something so wild about the contrast between how understated it looks and how it feels like a dense, concentrated ingot of luxury on the wrist. Btw the Lange in your profile picture looks absolutely stunning! Great taste!

Pending Approval

thank you for the kind words. i will compliment your taste as well once you have purchased that lange.

Pending Approval

The Patek Seal meaning -1 to +2 secs is for their tourbillons. Other watches are allowed -3 to + 2, and -5 to +3. Patek awarding their watches their own seal doesn't really mean much to me, I'd rather the Geneva Seal.

1 Like
Pending Approval

so you don’t believe their accuracy claim. do you also not believe that rolex watches are -2 to +2? because superlative chronometer is also an internal certification. there’s plenty to not like about patek, we don’t need to make up fantasies like their watches don’t meet the advertised specs.

Pending Approval

What? I was just correcting you on their advertised specs. Not making up fantasies.

1 Like
Pending Approval

oh sorry, i thought you meant the pp seal accuracy doesn’t count since it’s is an internal certification, unlike the geneva seal.

Pending Approval

I would look at one in the flesh if you haven’t already. While Rich has produced a great article, I don’t know if one can truly appreciate what Chopard is doing without really getting their hands on one and seeing it in the flesh.

1 Like
Pending Approval

It’s both the level of finishing and the watchmaking. Four mainsprings is a lot of kinetic energy to manage. Doing it in something this wearable is impressive.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

Beautiful watch and nice write-up.

Pending Approval

Brilliant watch.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Love this article, and while I wasn't at Watches and Wonders, I read all the posts and stayed at a Holiday Inn last night. This was the watch of the show for me. Should I find myself considerably more liquid, I'd buy this and it's companion dark blue/gold and call it a day.

1 Like
Pending Approval

And maybe stay at another hotel 😉

1 Like