trophy slideshow-left slideshow-right chevron-left chevron-right chevron-light chevron-light play play-outline external-arrow pointer hodinkee-shop hodinkee-shop share-arrow share show-more-arrow watch101-hotspot instagram nav dropdown-arrow full-article-view read-more-arrow close close close email facebook h image-centric-view newletter-icon pinterest search-light hodinkee-logo search magnifying-glass thumbnail-view twitter view-image checkmark triangle-down chevron-right-circle chevron-right-circle-white lock shop live events conversation watch plus plus-circle camera comments download x heart comment default-watch-avatar overflow check-circle right-white right-black comment-bubble instagram speech-bubble shopping-bag shop watch Stories Sort Arrows New Search Clear Search

Introducing The Christopher Ward C12 'Loco' (Live Pics)

Powered by the brand's second-ever in-house movement, Christopher Ward calls this their biggest release yet.

ADVERTISEMENT
What We Know

Big news out of Maidenhead, England, and Biel, Switzerland, today as the two locales for Christopher Ward's watchmaking have announced their next new big release – the C12 "Loco". It's a new model that takes the brand's integrated sports watch, "The Twelve," and adds the new manually-wound in-house calibre, the CW-003, with a striking open balance design. The name is both a reference to the Locomotive train, driving the development of Christopher Ward forward, and because they say the watch is a bit crazy. The watch you see in the live pictures is a pre-production piece, so we'll be sharing a few photos directly from Christopher Ward as well.

Christopher Ward Open Balance

The C12 Loco is powered by the CW-003 movement, which has a seriously impressive 144-hour power reserve, and the balance on the front ticks at 28,800 vph with a timing accuracy of -0/+7 seconds per day (also impressive). It also features a variety of hand finishing techniques, especially on the bridges, which are polished and angled. The rear side of the watch features a more austere movement design with three long, exposed bridges, and two large barrels for the power reserve.

Christopher Ward Open Balance
Christopher Ward Open Balance

The watch is cased in a redesigned, three-piece, 41mm stainless steel Twelve case, with steeply downturned lugs. The C12 measures 13.7mm thick (including the 3.55mm front box crystal and 0.4mm rear crystal), and it still features the brand's integrated bracelet design with a butterfly clasp and a single micro-adjust link near the clasp.

Christopher Ward Open Balance
Christopher Ward Open Balance
C12 Loco
C12 Loco
C12 Loco

The C12 "Loco" comes in four dial colors: an anthracite grey/black, white, bright blue, and bright orange. There's also the option to buy the C12 on a color-matched rubber strap with deployant claps instead of the integrated bracelet, though keep in mind, the bracelet has built-in micro-adjust, which is a great deal at the price. Oh yes, and the price; it's $4,595 on the strap and $4,825 on bracelet.

What We Think

Christopher Ward continues to surprise and push the boundaries of what's possible in a more affordable package. The C1 "Bel Canto" set the tone for a brand that was looking to expand from the position of relying on the creation of affordable yet familiar designs. There's a lot of value in this new C12 "Loco" and the idea of an open balance design like this for less than $5,000 is attractive (not to mention the power reserve and stated accuracy), but I will say, it struck me as less of an advancement for the brand than that of the Bel Canto. 

Christopher Ward Open Balance

I covered "The Twelve" about a year ago, and it's a comfortable design with many great features for the price. They've also built the collection into one with great variety– steel, titanium, openworked, 40mm, 38mm, 36mm – and that's great for the market. But I can't help but think how close the watch looks to the Czapek Antarctique. Then it was pointed out to me (and I had somehow missed) that Adrian Buchmann, who has worked for quite a few years at Christopher Ward (and designed "The Twelve,") was also involved in the design of the Antarctique. That puts a finer point on the similarities for me. 

Yes, Gerald Genta had a design vision that evolved from the Royal Oak to the Nautilus, the Locomotive, and others, but they were evolutions and didn't feel as close as the Czapek and CW do. Then, after polling some colleagues, we all agreed the new "Loco" looks a lot like the Antartique Tourbillon from the front and has touches of Armin Strom on the movement side. I even feel unsure about the name after the re-launch of the Credor Locomotive last year.

Christopher Ward Open Balance

Yet there are plenty of arguments and positives in support of this watch. With the amount of bang for the buck you get, I can understand the appeal of adding one to your collection. From the aesthetic to the comfort to the micro-adjust, there's a lot going for the C12 "Loco." I think price sensitivity will be high on the market for a while, and with Christopher Ward's business model, it's hard to beat the value they provide, as long as the tariff situation doesn't hit the brand too hard

As such, any critique I make of their design is always done with the hope that it will catch the eye of the brand and help them push a bit more to bring something truly unique to the market. To be clear, the C12 is far from an unsuccessful watch, but I feel the above context is worth mentioning in a consideration of the Loco, especially when it comes to the design language. 

Christopher Ward Open Balance
Christopher Ward Open Balance
Christopher Ward Open Balance

The sample I had in for photographs accidentally included microadjust on both sides of the clasp, but you should expect one micro adjust per watch.

Zooming out a bit, as a follow up to the Bel Canto and a major flagship for the design footing of the The Twelve, the C12 Loco is an exciting move for Christopher Ward that continues the brand's work in the still-popular integrated steel sport watches while expanding it's scope of watchmaking and technical prowess. While elements of the design are indeed recognizable, it's hard to understate the appeal when you factor for a price point that actively undercuts much of the comparisons (competition or otherwise). This has long been an element of Christopher Ward's enthusiast-driven success, and the C12 Loco does little to push this train off the rails. 


The Basics

Brand: Christopher Ward
Model: C12 Loco

Diameter: 41mm with a 47.5mm lug-to-lug
Thickness: 13.7mm
Case Material: Stainless steel
Dial Color: Anthracite, blue, orange, or white
Indexes: Applied
Lume: Hands and hour markers
Water Resistance: 30m
Strap/Bracelet: Integrated stainless steel bracelet or rubber bracelet with deployant strap

Christopher Ward Open Balance

The Movement

Caliber: CW-003
Functions: Hours, minutes, open balance
Power Reserve: 144 hours
Winding: Manual
Frequency: 4Hz
Jewels: 29
Chronometer Certified: No, -0/+7 seconds per day


Pricing & Availability

Price: $4,595 on strap and $4,825 on bracelet
Availability: Immediately on launch with a number of pre-produced pieces, with two more drops before the end of the year.
Limited Edition: No

For more, click here.

Please log in or sign up to leave a comment.
Pending Approval

Any notes on how it fits, feels, and wears? I’d be interested to learn.

Pending Approval

A Tudor Changing a Dial Colour or Bracelet, gets a more positive article then this? 😂

2 Likes
Pending Approval

Love the watch but hate the sales tactics. Raise your own capital dont ask buyers to let you sit on their money for 8-12 months. At least they dint do the limited edition so they could sell out nonsense.

Pending Approval

Great looks, great value.

Pending Approval

I appreciate the technical effort behind this movement and the overall value, but there are many things to improve on the design side. First, a 6d movement with manual wind, no power reserve indicator and a screw down crown doesn't feel practical. At least make the movement automatic or add a power indicator. Secondly, a high accuracy movement with no seconds hand, again doesn't feel useful. Thirdly, the screw down crown with only 30m is a very odd design choice. Now to the highly subjective part. I feel the Twelve case is too niche for such a bold release, they should have gone with a standard case. Compared to the beautiful textured dial on a standard Twelve, the brushed dial parts on this look very bland. It kind of feels like 1st gen Bel Canto vs Bel Canto Classic. The overall design of the dial could also be improved, I feel there are too many horizontal straight lines which is not visually great, or at least doesn't look that great to me. Overall, it's a great attempt that I'm sure will have a lot of fans, but I feel they rushed the design. I'm hopeful that future iterations would address some of the shortcomings, or at least that they will offer some alternative models with this movement down the road. I also agree with the article that this is not as innovative as Bel Canto. For me personally, Bel Canto remains the best watch released by CW to date, by far.

Pending Approval

I like it, appreciate it and it is amazing value, but it doesn't do it for me aesthetically. The movement looks great. Excellent release.

Pending Approval

A big slap on the face of big brands ripping off customers based on so called horological history with very basic 3 hander movements! I do not see even a single negative to report here when the offering is 10x lesser for an equivalent watch. Bravo CW!

Pending Approval

Looks like a Girard Perregaux Triple Bridge movement minus one bridge. I just wonder about the positioning of this watch. It isn't a dress watch, it definitely isn't a sports watch and the movement, though certainly impressively presented, doesn't really offer anything new for the money.

Pending Approval

I am surprised by the underlying negative tone of this article. This is truly an amazing release. Considering how hard it would be to follow after the Bel Canto, I think CW delivered a very impressive watch

10 Likes
Pending Approval

The indices look like a sandworm. Look forward to a bronze sand Dune collaboration, appropriately steampunk.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Now that is something I would very much like to see!

Pending Approval

Watch of the year so far. CW is transforming the watch world and I’m kind of surprised to hear all of these critiques. They are putting out stuff that usually costs 10x the price and has largely been unattainable to the vast majority of watch enthusiasts (chiming watches, free sprung dial side balances) and doing it with features and style that literally no other brand comes close to matching at these prices. Bravo!

9 Likes
Pending Approval

It’s definitely not as forward thinking as the Bel Canto, but for me this is a lot more wearable than Bel Canto.

4 Likes
Pending Approval

It feels negligent to not mention in the article that this watch features a free sprung balance. At under $5K I can't think of another watch off the top of my head that features such a haute horlogerie feature that is both aesthetically and technically superior to something like ETACHRON or pin-based regulators (which are sadly common in watches many multiples of this price). To not explain why this matters is to partially miss the story of why this watch is significant, and amazing value.

4 Likes
Pending Approval

There are hundreds of watches under $5k with free-sprung balances from the Swatch brands (Tissot/Longines/Hamilton etc), also Tudor, and some Chinese tourbillons.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Hundreds? Cross off the Chinese brands bc most are not cross shopping China vs Swiss. But hundreds? Can you share some of your favorites? Do they utilize variable inertia like this? Def good to call out that there are so many free-sprung balances below this price (if indeed true), but I think it’s disingenuous to make it sound like open-worked, free sprung w variable inertia screws and hand polished bridges is run-of-the-mill under $5k. I cannot think of another watch that “beats” it in terms of specs and delivering expensive looking design language (even though this one is not for me and I do own a bel canto) Cheers

Pending Approval

Hundreds was referring to Swatch's offerings. Not a favorite of mine, but the Tissot PRX is a popular watch with variable inertia balance.

Pending Approval

Thanks for pointing those out, but let's look at each one in more detail. The reason the movements in the Swatch group brands are fitted inside watches that retail below $1K is because their pallet forks and escape wheels are made of plastic, and the watches are accurate to +/- 15 s/day. The variable inertia implementation is not really as a haute horlogerie feature but rather an advancement of industrial mass production techniques. The finishing is orders of magnitude worse than the CW, it's unclear based on my research if the screws on the wheel are even adjustable by hand, and of course aesthetically I don't see how anyone could argue the back of a PRX looks nicer than this CW (subjective of course, but I am curious to see someone try to make the case lol). Touche on the Tudor callout, although of course the aesthetic point remains with the CW. This comparison could've been mentioned in the article as an example of why CW is doing great things that compete price-wise and technically with output from the Rolex family. Again, missed opportunity. I'm entirely unfamiliar with Chinese tourbillons. I think the point remains that it would've been immensely useful to write about how maybe only the Tudor movements are a real comp here technically, and they're still relatively unremarkable from an aesthetic point of view at this sub-$5k price point.

Pending Approval

The nylon escapements are only present on some Tissot models, and part of the brand's heritage (see the Tissot Astrolon) Hamiltons at the same price use normal metal escapements. The Powermatic movements work like Patek's Gryomax system, you can turn the cams with a normal screwdriver, but Swatch also sells a special tool to certified watchmakers. Chinese watches use both micro-stella style screws (like the CW) and gyromax style cams, with the latter being more common.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Especially if you consider secondary market. I completely agree with your comment.

Pending Approval

There are lots of Swatch Group Powermatic 80 which are chronometer and even better than that. At Longines there is also the very capable 3.5 Hz slim caliber, also in 5 Hz. Yes, depending on the price point the finishing can be different from the Bel Canto but that was not your question in the first place.

1 Like
Pending Approval

The Dink seems a little scared to give CW the praise it deserves here. It's strange. If this had one of a half dozen other brand badges on the face, I can't help but feel that it would have been received with gushing praise. I think a more likely reading is that this release (and the Bel Canto) really challenges premium brands to show why it is that we should be spending 10x of this on their pieces. And let's be clear - they should be worried.

16 Likes
Pending Approval

Oh, I'm sure the folks in Geneva, Le Brassus and Glashütte are all shaking in their boots over the coming "Christopher Ward crisis."

1 Like
Pending Approval

He’s right that CW does make you realize how much cheaper the big brands COULD be but absolutely true that those brands are not afraid of CW ha. If anything it seemed like they were very enthusiastic and impressed with the Bel Canto

Pending Approval

Absolutely - if you're an easily led hype bro with more money than sense and/or possess the modern insecure desperation of getting fellow flexers to like you, then obviously you won't be interested in this. That's not the point I'm making.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Feel like CW fans are the Trump in the Trump yelling at the kid mowing the grass. The constant need to tell everyone how great their watches are yet no one really cares.

Pending Approval

It feels as though you are striving to find comparisons. The Antartique is a fine watch (and I prefer it's case geometry) but comparing it to the CW Twelve is about as convincing as comparing the Antartique to the Tissot PRX, or the PRX to the Twelve. And to extend that to the Tourbillon is doubly off-piste. The dial balance and composition is completely different, the texture completely different, the style of ornamentation of entirely different philosophies. Similarly, it is a failure of imagination required to discredit the Loco's (admittedly atrociously named) achievement on the basis of the Bel Canto - from an absolute technical stand point, a ground-up in house movement is a much more impressive achievement that a modules for a consumer calibre, while the moving of the balance and escapement dialside and implementation of a free-sprung balance of original design are both more technically challenging than the dial-side chime.

7 Likes
Pending Approval

Very cool. Great looking. Good value. But not for me.

Pending Approval

Many negative vibes for me; I can not see the minutes between 26 and 34. No seconds hand.

Pending Approval

Nope. It's a Bel Canto clone dial, without the chime, done in heavier stainless steel and boasting a screw down crown, but with poor water resistance. And at a ridiculous price.

1 Like
Pending Approval

At least to me, a bit reminiscent of some the pieces from Armin Strom.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

No doubt. Surely influenced by it. CW not afraid of some “inspiration”

1 Like
Pending Approval

I'm a fan of CW. This isn't quite a hit for me. I think it's that I just don't want this in a 12 case, but then again, I wouldn't want it in the Bel Canto case either. The movement is really cool and I love the dial, especially the white one. I prefer this dial to the Bel Canto, actually. I'm just not crazy about it in that case. The thin bracelet with a chunkier case seems like a possible mismatch (says the guy who was just yesterday saying that I don't mind the thickness of the BB Pro). I'll be curious to see one in person at Wind Up or somewhere like that.

1 Like
Pending Approval

I would definitely buy this.

1 Like
Pending Approval

Exceptional. I’m pleased CW didn’t feel the need to shoehorn their divisive logo onto the dial, looks super clean without. Great job guys 👏

3 Likes
Pending Approval

i like it, cw definitely punching above their weight.

3 Likes
Pending Approval

I dig it. There is a lot of well thought out details and value propositions at <$5k. Micro adjust bracelet. Some hand finishing. Luminous indices and minute/hour hands. I think most watch nerds can appreciate open balance and skeleton designs, they’re just plain cool. Plus the blue and orange dials actually look pretty good. Bummer you can’t see one in person before buying…but the 60 day free return window is tempting me to try one out. Lastly, I appreciate a 6 day power reserve on a manual winding movement and appreciate the 5 yr warranty even more for some extra peace of mind taking a gamble at this price point with any micro brand.

4 Likes
Pending Approval

This seems technically impressive but just not into the look of the dial or the thickness of the case.

1 Like
Pending Approval

I think you might be wrong about the extra microadjust on the clasp. Other reviews I read listed that as a feature, not a mistake. 4 points of microadjust vs just two. Im pretty sure it is supposed to be that way.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

Affordable Girard Perregaux Bridges vibes on a PRX bracelet.

1 Like
Pending Approval

This is already easily a better watch than the hideous Rolex Landlubber. Sure the Rolex has a more sophisticated movement, and higher quality finishing, but it’s also 3 times the price, ugly, and boring. This is a great surprise from CW, which is out of control lately in what they are able to accomplish at the prices they sell for. This is a “poor man’s” MB&F. Fantastic. The only thing that kills it is the screw down crown. A manual wind watch shouldn’t have one no matter how long the power reserve is. Only dive watches should have screw down crowns, this obsession with water resistance is madness. Just don’t swim with your $5K watch lol. Most people never swim at all and complain about water resistance, it’s such utter stupidity. And no one is diving to 100 meters or more with any fancy expensive Swiss watch. Just stop it already.

11 Likes
Pending Approval

Jason Heaton does. So does Paul Scurfield. So not many but certainly not no one.

Pending Approval

I swim with all my watches on no matter the price and don't want to worry about what I have on the wrist. You will find that very few people ever dive to 100 m no matter what is on their wrist, but the 100 m doesn't refer to the depth, it is the pressure of you jumping in or hit by waves. It is a bit ridiculous comparing it to the new Rolex offering, it is nice that you prefer this and that is a fine choice.

Pending Approval

The price is way too high for what this is. Wouldn't even spend $1k. It's rough-cut all the way around, the water resistance should be at least 100m with a case that size, and you can get far higher quality pieces with better names for $5k. Zenith Defy anyone? Hard pass.

2 Likes
Pending Approval

With respect, I don’t think you understand the watches you’re talking about here. A Zenith Defy is just a skeletonized watch, that’s not the same as a watch with a dial side escapement. This is a bargain at $5K. If you don’t like this watch, that’s fine, but you’re not comparing apples to apples. The movement in this new CW is bespoke to this watch only. No other watch in the world has this movement, including any other CW. The movement in the Zenith is the same as several Zenith models. This new CW has a custom dial side escapement unlike any other watch anywhere near this price, to say nothing about the 6 day power reserve. This is a “poor man’s” MB&F. Sure it won’t have the same exact finish quality as an MB&F but it also doesn’t cost $68,000. Those watches are not 14 times better. You wouldn’t spend $1K for this? Ok but you don’t know what you’re talking about. A $1K watch has an off the shelf 38 hour Selitta movement with zero hand finishing. Not a custom in-house dial side escapement with dual barrels, manual wind with a free sprung balance, and a guaranteed accuracy of -0/+7. The features in this movement only exist in watches that cost over $4K or much more. If you don’t like the look or style that’s fine. I think the new Rolex is the ugliest watch, but I can appreciate the movement in it for the tech and what it brings to the table. There’s objective facts and subjective opinions.

19 Likes
Pending Approval

I don't care if this watch gives you a shiatsu massage on the hour. My subjective opinion, it's an ugly watch and looks borderline cheap.

1 Like
Pending Approval

what are some of these far higher quality pieces with better names for $5k?

Pending Approval

You are comparing a $50,000 watch to a $5000 watch, and saying there are too many similarities? Pretty sure anyone considering the CW isn’t in the market for the other one. Just seems unnecessarily critical of the CW just for criticism’s sake.

17 Likes
Pending Approval

So with that logic, one shouldn’t criticise a counterfeit Rolex because the vast price gap annuls the issue of plagiarism?

3 Likes
Pending Approval

Your argument makes no sense and has no relevance at all. The CW isn’t a counterfeit. It’s also not plagiarism (no one is suggesting that). It’s a watch that has certain design cues that the designer has used on multiple watches. (Never seen a designer do THAT before).

8 Likes
Pending Approval

You’re arguing about semantics. Plagarism, design cues, references- it’s all seeing something you like and putting into what you’re making. Christopher Ward tell every journalist that the same person made this as the Czapek; their whole MO is making cheap luxury watches, and that seems to be by producing own-brand-cola versions of your favourite Oris, MB&F and now Czapek x Girard Perregaux. Show me a single Christopher ward that anyone could make a homage of without it looking like a homage to something else first?

3 Likes
Pending Approval

And that’s fine, you have made relevant points this time, rather than talking about counterfeit Rolexes.

Pending Approval

I mean, the Moonphase, the C60 concept, the Bel Canto, and the Sealander Elite all pretty immediately jump to mind...

Pending Approval

I struggle to believe the same person designed this and the Czapek. Maybe someone was involved in both, but one is elegant and svelte and the other is poorly proportioned and bulbous (in my opinion of course).

1 Like
Pending Approval

I find it impressive that CW can produce an in house movement that provides 144 hours of power reserve while looking good, and thoroughly disappointing that much older, more expensive brands still consider 72 hours reserve elite.

18 Likes
Pending Approval

Loco Live. I love that Ramones album.

3 Likes