So far on Continuations I have had two big series: Tech Tuesdays and Uncertainty Wednesdays (since I have migrated to Paragraph these have become somewhat buried but I will fix that). Both series ran over several years and I greatly enjoyed writing them. More recently I have been in a writing rut. To get me out of it I will attempt to write regularly again and this time the topic will be philosophy. My plan is to post on Mondays. Let’s see how it goes. These posts will be less an exposition of past or contemporary philosophers and much more my own musings. In other words: YMMV.

What do I even mean by philosophy? To me philosophy is a set of ideas that helps people live by motivating their efforts and informing their decisions. These ideas should meet some criteria:

1. Accessibility: the ideas need to be understandable by everyday people. Philosophy that is cloaked in impenetrable language is, as far as I am concerned, useless. If I present ideas here in a way that people can’t follow, please call me out on it and I will try to do better.

2. Consistency: the ideas shouldn’t be in obvious contradiction with each other. That doesn’t mean that there can’t be tensions. Life after all is full of trade-offs. But “an eye for an eye” versus “turn the other cheek” feels like a pretty big inconsistency. I have written before about why consistency is an important aspect of personal philosophy.

3. Validity: there should be some evidence that the ideas are sound. For one there should be some reason to expect that the ideas can help individuals and communities. Also the ideas should be informed by our scientific understanding of the world.

What are my goals with this new series beyond getting myself to write more? First, I love thinking about philosophical questions and as always forcing myself to write will dramatically improve the quality of my thinking. It is way too easy to wing arguments in conversation. Second, LLMs are exciting new writing and thought partners. Philosophical ideas will be a fertile ground for exploration. Third, as I have pointed out in my book The World After Capital, there is an urgent need for a philosophy that supports living in a post-industrial age. I call the next age the Knowledge Age and I make a strong plug for a renewed humanism as the proper philosophy. In this series I am planning to develop these ideas further.

Here are some topics I am planning to cover (please add suggestions in the comments)

• the role of language

• the power and limitations of knowledge

• the source and nature of values

• the possibility of free will

• the relationship between consciousness and identity

• the nature of meaning and purpose in a high automation world

• the role of uncertainty and probability in ethical decision-making

• the intersection between technology and human nature

I am sure that people who have studied more philosophy than I may find some of my approaches to be rather pedestrian. I am super happy for feedback. After all, one of the best ways to learn is to be wrong on the Internet.

Illustration by Claude Sonnet 3.5 based on a conversation about this series.