Win or lose, Stann's commentating was horrible this fight

Scheme

Scheme

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
8,793
Reaction score
9,919
He called shots for Cub that didn't even land, and rarely acknowledged when Artem lands...
 
He is gargling Swanson's balls. Extremely biased. Former team mates as well
 
Lobov was hitting shoulders and arms quite a lot, where as Swanson was actually landing on target, to be fair to Stann.
 
Win or lose, Stann's commentating was horrible this fight

Stann's fighting?
 
Bit like Joe on Chuck vs vitor
 
Stann's commentary is horrible in every fight.
 
What does "win or lose" have to do with anything you said?
 
beyond bias, cub won 48-47, he made it sound like he won 50-40. Artem was piecing him up a little in the first and second
 
Scheme said:
He called shots for Cub that didn't even land, and rarely acknowledged when Artem lands...
Click to expand...
I noticed that, Artem was clearly out landing Cub in round 1 and he called it completely opposite.
 
Scheme said:
He called shots for Cub that didn't even land, and rarely acknowledged when Artem lands...
Click to expand...

Probably because Lobov didn't land anything remotely noteworthy
 
Yeah. It was ridiculous.

Artem has cub up against the fence, cub lands a weak knee = "you're not safe anywhere...<laugh> this kid is crazy"

{<doc}
 
giphy.gif

i have never felt more free
 
It was horrible commentating all around.
 
Scheme said:
He called shots for Cub that didn't even land, and rarely acknowledged when Artem lands...
Click to expand...

I only caught the last round and the last part of the 4th and even I noticed this.
 
He's a real nuthugger for Jackson fighters since he use to train there. Talking about Dodson and how he use to work at Chuck E. Cheese. Who gives a fuck?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,036
Messages
55,463,019
Members
174,786
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top