QOTD: Which Vehicles Deserve a Cost-cutting Trim Level?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Yesterday, Tim Cain reported on the new Chevrolet Tahoe Custom trim, which lowers the point of entry on the Tahoe by $3,750 for 2018. If you’re a nerd and enjoy trim-level discussions like I do, this is an important moment. For the first time since the Tahoe grew to four doors in 1995, you’ll be able to buy a trim lower than the LS.

This new (relatively) low-cost trim is seen by many Internet Car Enthusiasts here at TTAC as the way forward: dispensing with unnecessary options like infotainment, large wheels, and a third row seat that rarely sees use. Seems like a decent enough idea, so let’s take it across the board today.

Which vehicles deserve a cost-cutting trim level?

In our modern automotive era, manufacturers are hard pressed to compete with the standard features offered by competitors in each segment. Since the 1980s, companies like Hyundai and Kia have democratized standard features to ever lower entry points at a rapid pace. Options once found only in the realm of larger, more expensive luxury vehicles have become standard fare on compact Korean hatchbacks.

All this expansion in standard features (and perhaps easy access to longer-term loans) has created a new opportunity for value-oriented basic trims like the Tahoe Custom above.

My pick today was going to cite Porsche as an example of removing options to lower cost — but then I remembered that’s the opposite of the way Porsche operates. So here’s a different example.

That’s right, this other Chevrolet is a good candidate for a bare-bones trim. The Impala starts in LS trim with a 2.5-liter inline-four engine (197 horsepower) for $27,500. MyLink and an 8-screen is standard. USB outlets, satellite radio, a power driver’s seat, floor mats, keyless start, OnStar, power windows and locks, and air conditioning are all standard. At least half of that can go, pushing the entry point lower. Fleets and special order companies would love it, and it would satisfy the ICE’s desire for a basic, large sedan. Win-win, Impala Custom.

As a historical bonus, the Custom trim name already appeared on basic Buicks for many, many years.

What’s your selection of vehicle(s) deserving of a good cost-cutting trim?

[Images: Murilee Martin / The Truth About Cars, GM]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 113 comments
  • Anomaly149 Anomaly149 on Aug 16, 2017

    One of the funniest things is how power windows are cheaper than manual windows due to volume hits and unique engineering. (power locks over manual locks, as well) Overall, it doesn't make much sense to do this because a "bargain basement trim" vehicle will need a lot of unique engineering (produced at a somewhat inflated price-per-unit due to volume hits) to produce something you have to sell for less dollars. There are some places it makes sense, but by in large unique "low-trim" content is a money-loser just done for advertising purposes.

  • Mchan1 Mchan1 on Aug 16, 2017

    Due to today's technology, it doesn't make sense for the automakers to make Stripper trim vehicles much or anymore. It'll cost more to make a vehicle with manual parts (i.e. windows/door locks) than it would to make a vehicle with power door locks/windows due to the number of units sold. I don't miss Stripper models as I had my first honda civic coupe DX, dirt trim model (Manual windows/door locks & side mirrors, NO A/C, NO power steering, NO radio/speakers/antenna) and you had to floor it to climb any slight inclined roadway. Didn't need a gym membership to stay fit because of the manual steering and the heat from no a/c. To this day, can't stand Honda cars esp. Civics! Funny this was, I came from a Honda family but many family members can't stand Honda not for many years now.

  • ToolGuy This might be a good option for my spouse when it becomes available -- thought about reserving one but the $500 deposit is a little too serious. Oh sorry, that was the Volvo EX30, not the Mustang. Is Volvo part of Ford? Is the Mustang an EV? I'm so confused.
  • Mikey My late wife loved Mustangs ..We alway rented one while travelling . GM blood vetoed me purchasing one . 3 years after retirement bought an 08 rag top, followed by a 15 EB Hard top, In 18 i bought a low low mileage 05 GT rag with a stick.. The car had not been properly stored. That led to rodent issues !! Electrical nightmare. Lots of bucks !! The stick wasn't kind to my aging knees.. The 05 went to a long term dedicated Mustang guy. He loves it .. Today my garage tenant is a sweet 19 Camaro RS rag 6yl Auto. I just might take it out of hibernation this weekend. The Mustang will always hold a place in my heart.. Kudos to Ford for keeping it alive . I refuse to refer to the fake one by that storied name .
  • Ajla On the Mach-E, I still don't like it but my understanding is that it helps allow Ford to continue offering a V8 in the Mustang and F-150. Considering Dodge and Ram jumped off a cliff into 6-cylinder land there's probably some credibility to that story.
  • Ajla If I was Ford I would just troll Stellantis at all times.
  • Ronin It's one thing to stay tried and true to loyal past customers; you'll ensure a stream of revenue from your installed base- maybe every several years or so.It's another to attract net-new customers, who are dazzled by so many other attractive offerings that have more cargo capacity than that high-floored 4-Runner bed, and are not so scrunched in scrunchy front seats.Like with the FJ Cruiser: don't bother to update it, thereby saving money while explaining customers like it that way, all the way into oblivion. Not recognizing some customers like to actually have right rear visibility in their SUVs.
Next