State Lawmaker Posts ‘All Lives Splatter’ Meme On Facebook

1 posted on 09/21/2017 3:43:16 PM PDT by grundle

2 posted on 09/21/2017 3:44:20 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)

3 posted on 09/21/2017 3:45:55 PM PDT by CGASMIA68

4 posted on 09/21/2017 3:46:11 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)

She will be forced to resign for this. I do like it though.

5 posted on 09/21/2017 3:47:02 PM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever! It is offical, we are at war!)

Don’t post anything you can’t defend.

(Comment directed at the lawmaker, but good advice to anyone)

6 posted on 09/21/2017 3:50:36 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)

She should introduce legislation that people blocking roads are a terrorist action akin to kidnapping, and that force may be used to create a passage.

Already been proposed in other states, I hear. May have been passed in one.

7 posted on 09/21/2017 3:50:57 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)

Not smart of her to do that.
Doesn’t she know how the left loves to hate us?

8 posted on 09/21/2017 3:52:41 PM PDT by lee martell

Plain and straight to the point!

9 posted on 09/21/2017 3:54:36 PM PDT by DaveA37

Email her, tell her you support her!
Lynne.DiSanto@sdlegislature.gov
Liberals have no sense of humor.

10 posted on 09/21/2017 3:56:13 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Drone Soros and sons!!!)

At least it wasn’t a golfer trying to assassinate Hillary Clinton with a golf ball!!! /S

11 posted on 09/21/2017 4:04:53 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)

[ She should introduce legislation that people blocking roads are a terrorist action akin to kidnapping ]

I agree. It’s “Unlawful Restraint”.

12 posted on 09/21/2017 4:16:11 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)

She should introduce legislation that people blocking roads are a terrorist action akin to kidnapping, and that force may be used to create a passage. Already been proposed in other states, I hear. May have been passed in one.

I'm pretty sure that JAYWALKING is a ticketable offense in most cities across the US.

13 posted on 09/21/2017 4:31:12 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)

14 posted on 09/21/2017 4:36:37 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)

"Let's go down to the protest baby, and give them their fair share of abuse."

15 posted on 09/21/2017 4:40:27 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The so-called birthright citizenship clause:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

There are two tests here.

Lets look at test one.

Here's how Leftists read it.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Does this grant citizenship to all persons born in the United States?

On the face of it no. It doesn't even come close to saying that.

The inclusion of an additional stipulation in addition to simply being born on our soil, renders this a false premise. All persons are not granted citizenship for having been born here, without being judged to be under the jurisdiction thereof.

For this reason, it is a false premise to state every person born in the United States is a citizen.

Now lets look at test two.

...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof...

Leftists love to claim that illegal aliens must abide by the laws of the United States (all except immigrating legally, I presume). This they use as primafacia evidence that illegals aliens "...are subject to the jurisdiction thereof,...".

Is that true? NO, and it's a very easy thing to test.

The very inclusion of this verbage in the amendment deligitimizes this claim.

If being on U.S. soil made illegal aliens "...subject of the jurisdiction thereof..." all by itself, this further stipulation would not have been provided.

If all illegal aliens were subject to the jurisdication thereof, the Citizenship claus would read, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States ~~and subject to the jurisdiction thereof~~, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Jurisdiction language would not be necessary, and it would not have been included.

The jurisdiction language had to be addressing something different than merely being present in the United States, when being born.

Conclusion:

The 14th Amendment does not grant citizenship to illegal aliens born on U.S. soil.

16 posted on 09/21/2017 4:44:08 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794