Legal risk???? Clinton has never taken any of his accusers to court... Simple reason why he hasn't, he's guilty.

Another lame opinion piece from the CBC with no commenting allowed (most CBC stories allow commenting... Whenever they have a story they know will invite negative comments toward a liberal cause or political figure, they close the commenting section.)

Fellow main stream media members circling the wagons to support their FELLOW MAIN-STREAM MEDIA MEMBER Megyn Kelly. She’s been dead to me for some time.

It’s ok for Megan and others to devote time to criticizing Trump, but only if they devote comparable time to criticizing the other candidates.

How dare anybody challenge the Establishmedia and their narrative to destroy Trump.

Pray America wakes

He hasn’t taken any of his accusers to court because of discovery rules. Plain and simple.

Bill Clinton hasn’t taken any of his accusers to court.

DJT should file defamation tort NOW, while he is still an un-elected citizen.

Discovery works both ways, compadre.

...but the fact is only one of them has confessed on videotape that he grabs strangers by the genitals and pops Tic Tacs in his mouth in case he decides to force his lips on a woman.

Sheeesh, and only one has ever jizzed on the dress of a subordinate...

“She might well think both Trump and Clinton are sexual predators, but the fact is only one of them has confessed on videotape that he grabs strangers by the genitals...”

Bill Clinton has been convicted in a court of law for doing just that and much worse, and Hillary has been confirmed as trying to destroy all his accusers.

Another snooty Canuck who can’t mind his own damn business, eh?

Kelly is not a journalist. She is a gossip columnist for teen-age girls.

Know that well, but the one that is most vulnerable with the most to lose always elects not to put themselves in that position. These women pursued (at least one, and others willing) and what happened on the one that did? He paid out $850K....that’s yer ‘discovery works both ways’ dude.

The “BIG POCKETS” argument.
I’m down with that Gaffer.

In the case he paid up on, she described his Willie to a T. He and his lawyers elected to settle in order to keep him from Disproving that in court. :0)

Boag: "There is no argument that much of Bill Clinton's conduct was deplorable. He lied under oath, but also to his wife and to his closest friends and colleagues. Some of the most serious allegations of his behaviour toward women persist to this day."

Apparently Mr. Boag is under the misguided belief that Hillary was somehow in the dark when it comes to her husbands perversion... That is completely laughable. She knew he was doing the intern, the maid, the guest, her friends, etc., etc.... What a fool!

If it had legs and a heartbeat Bill was on it, and Hillary even had her own intern squeeze... And Huma is still her loyal companion to this day.

... Oh... And apparently they decided to start allowing commenting. Feel free to sign up at the CBC and leave a comment but remember, they moderate so if you want to put a zinger on the CBC website be prepared for a ‘comment disabled’ label.

Are you referencing Willie’s willie or Trump’s willie.
Correct my confusion.

End-game? How can Billy-Jeff dispute a “crooked willie” in court.
Actually...I’d want to be there to LMAO!

This whole time I have been talking about CLINTON and his accusers. I know what Trump’s position is - he will sue their asses once he wins. That tells me THEIR discovery from the women won’t prove shit. He’s got truth on his side. Slick Willie didn’t, doesn’t and never will have.

“Another snooty Canuck who can’t mind his own damn business, eh?”

I had a Boag on my a$$ some time ago, but I had it cut off!