When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month. Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90. Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Post. Individual Article Access

Post is an ad-free social platform built for news. Join to access premium content from Worldcrunch and 100+ other trusted publishers. Post is an ad-free social platform built for news. Read On Post for Free

THE WASHINGTON POST

On North Korea, Trump Has Now Gone Full 'Madman'

The U.S. president's threat to 'totally destroy' a nation is beyond the pale. But is there method to it?

Trump leaving the podium after his speech on Sept. 19
Trump leaving the podium after his speech on Sept. 19
Aaron Blake

-OpEd-

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump took to the floor of the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday and, in his maiden speech there, called the leader of North Korea "Rocket Man," decried "loser terrorists' and said certain parts of the world are "in fact, going to hell."

But Trump's perhaps oddly chosen colloquialisms masked what was an astounding escalation of his rhetoric when it comes to North Korea. Just to be clear: The president of the United States threatened to wipe a country of 25 million people off the map.

"Now North Korea's reckless pursuit of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles threatens the entire world with unthinkable loss of human life," Trump said. He later added: "The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea. Rocket Man is on a suicide mission for himself."

This seems to be Trump even more fully embracing the so-called "madman theory."

Trump's rhetoric on North Korea has been very tough before. He turned heads last month by threatening to unleash "fire and fury" if North Korea and its leader, Kim Jong Un, threatened the United States. But Trump's speech Tuesday ratcheted things up in two respects: saying the United States would also unleash a massive response on behalf of its allies, and threatening to "totally destroy" the country.

"Fire and fury" could be interpreted as a threat to simply remove Kim and his government; "totally destroy North Korea" seems to be a signal to the North Korean people that they, too, could face annihilation alongside their government leaders. It sounds a lot like Trump is threatening an unprecedented effort to wipe out an entire nation, whether through nuclear weapons or more conventional means. It's a remarkably big statement, and the White House will undoubtedly be asked to clarify.

It's also different from the "fire and fury" comment in that this was Trump delivering a prepared speech, in which his words were undoubtedly pored over extensively beforehand. The White House acknowledged after Trump made the "fire and fury" comments that they were ad-libbed, and analysts generally agreed that perhaps the commander in chief got a little carried away and became hyperbolic — as he tends to do.

Rolling Stone magazine's Oct. 5 cover

Trump's address to the United Nations on Tuesday should erase any doubts that he is threatening an unprecedented military strike against North Korea. This seems to be Trump even more fully embracing the so-called "madman theory," in which he makes himself so unpredictable that other world leaders fear setting him off.

But that approach isn't without its downsides. Former general David Petraeus described it thusly a few days back:

"There is some merit to this. You can argue perhaps there is some merit to it in international relations, although it obviously can go too far. My concern there with the so-called "madman theory" — that actually Richard Nixon put forward through Kissinger where he had Kissinger tell the Soviets, "You know, Nixon's under a lot of pressure right now and, you know, he drinks at night sometimes, so you guys ought to be real careful. Don't push this into a crisis." There may, again, be some merit into the madman theory until you get in a crisis. But you do not want the other side thinking you are irrational in a crisis. You do not want the other side thinking that you might be sufficiently irrational to conduct a first strike or to do something, you know, so-called "unthinkable.""

Polls show the American people are not confident in Trump's ability to handle the North Korea situation, with 61% saying they are "uneasy." Trump's words Tuesday likely won't calm many fears, but he's clearly gambling on North Korea backing down in the face of big talk.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

Iranian Air Strikes Can't Touch Israel, But Are Killing Syrians All The Time

While the whole world was shocked by Iranian drones attacking Israel, which caused no casualties, nobody pays much attaention to the attacks being carried out by the same Iranian drones in northwestern Syria, where they regularly kill civilians.

Members of military personnel in civilian clothing inspect apparent remains of a ballistic missile lying in the desert.

Members of military personnel in civilian clothing inspect apparent remains of a ballistic missile lying in the desert in Israel, April 24 2024.

dpa/ZUMA
Mosab al-Yassin

IDLIB — Mohammed al-Sakaf was confident when he said that the drone launched by the Iranian militias, which injured his children while they were working in the olive farm south of Idlib, is the same type of drone that Iran launched on Israel earlier this month.

In an interview with Daraj, he asked: “Why was it unable to reach Israel on the night of April 14?”

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

Al-Sakkaf’s inquiry is a legitimate one since Iran’s missiles and drones didn’t hit any “meaningful” target in Israel. Most of the missiles and drones were intercepted and dropped over Jordan and Syria. A few reached Israel, according to the pictures published by the Israeli army.

Iran launched hundreds of drones, ballistic missiles and cruise missiles that sought to overwhelm Israel’s air defenses earlier this month. It was the first air attack on Israel by a foreign power since Iraq's late leader Saddam Hussein launched Scud missiles at Israel in the 1991 Gulf War.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest