Firms that burn up $1bn a year are sexy but statistically doomed
Five outliers - Chesapeake Energy, Netflix, Nextera Energy, Tesla and Uber - have collectively lost $100bn in the past decade
YVES SAINT LAURENT, Lady Gaga, David Bowie. Some people do not operate by the same rules as everyone else. Might the same be true of companies? Most bosses complain of being slaves to short-term profit targets. Yet a few flout the orthodoxy in flamboyant fashion. Consider Tesla, a maker of electric cars. This year, so far, it has missed its production targets and lost $1.8bn of free cashflow (the money firms generate after capital investment has been subtracted). No matter. If its founder Elon Musk muses aloud about driverless cars and space travel, its shares rise like a rocket—by 66% since the start of January. Tesla is one of a tiny cohort of firms with a licence to lose billions pursuing a dream. The odds of them achieving it are similar to those of aspiring pop stars and couture designers.
Investing today for profits tomorrow is what capitalism is all about. Amazon lost $4bn in 2012-14 while building an empire that now makes money. Nonetheless, it is rare for big companies to sustain heavy losses just to expand fast. If you examine the members of the Russell 1000 index of large American firms, only 25 of them, or 3.3%, lost over $1bn of free cashflow in 2016 (all figures exclude financial firms and are based on Bloomberg data). In 2007 the share was 1.4% and in 1997, under 1%. Most billion-dollar losers today are energy firms temporarily in the doldrums as they adjust to a recent plunge in oil prices. Their losses are an accident.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Reality distortion field”
Business October 21st 2017
- IBM lags in cloud computing and AI. Can tech’s great survivor recover?
- Why Airbus’s tie-up with Bombardier is so damaging for Boeing
- Saudi Aramco’s IPO is a mess
- A property billionaire rescues Harvey Weinstein’s studio
- An Indian aviation visionary runs into bureaucratic turbulence
- A geopolitical row with China damages South Korean business further
- Firms that burn up $1bn a year are sexy but statistically doomed
More from Business
Can Benetton be patched up?
Italy’s threadbare casual-fashion icon is stained with red ink
How to write the perfect CV
A job applicant walks into a bar
The soldiers of the silicon supply chain are worried
Geopolitics risks distorting a miracle of modern technology